Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Matrox LUMA A310F vs ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F
Released
Q4/2022
User rating
star star star star star
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310F or ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310F has a base frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC has a base frequency of 2.200 GHz+ 7 %. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q4/2022.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310F
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2882 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2994 place
  • More memory

    100% more memory

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    812 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1160 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow Intel Arc A750 Graphics
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 112
  • RT Cores
    6 left arrow 28
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 3584
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 448
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 224
Memory settings

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

  • Memory Bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Bus
    64 bit left arrow 256 bit
  • Memory Clock
    1938 MHz left arrow 2000 MHz
  • Memory Data Rate
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
Clock frequency

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

  • Base Clock
    2000 MHz left arrow 2200 MHz + 7%
  • Boost Clock
    2000 MHz left arrow 2200 MHz
  • Game Clock
    - left arrow -
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

  • Maximum Junction Temperature
    - left arrow -
  • TDP
    50 W-33 % left arrow 225 W
  • TDP (up)
    - left arrow -
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC.

  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan-Type
    Radial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Fan 2
    - left arrow -
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    - left arrow -
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • DisplayPort Ports
    4 × DisplayPort 2.1 left arrow 2 × DisplayPort 2.0
  • DVI Ports
    - left arrow -
  • HDCP Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    - left arrow 2 × HDMI 2.1
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • PCIe Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x16
  • Power Connectors
    - left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
  • USB-C Ports
    - left arrow -
  • VGA Ports
    - left arrow -
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
  • Max. resolution
    7680 × 4320 left arrow 7680 × 4320
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Height
    69 mm left arrow 132 mm
  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 271 mm
  • Slot Size
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    - left arrow 785 g
  • Width
    - left arrow 48 mm
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC and Matrox LUMA A310F.

  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
  • Launch Price (historical)
    - left arrow -
  • Part Number
    LUMA-A310F left arrow A750 CLD 8GO
  • Process Technology
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Game frame rates

Archive: saved catalog source links. The original measurement method and test conditions have not been verified; current source pages may differ from the imported content. Matrox LUMA A310F · ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming

Higher values are better in this metric.

3.07 TFLOPS
Matrox LUMA A310F
15.76 TFLOPS
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine

Higher values are better in this metric.

7 fps
Matrox LUMA A310F
43 fps
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Latest comparisons