Family illustration.
What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 9 7950X or Intel Core Ultra 9 285K? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. Released in 2022-09-27.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 24 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2024.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Higher clock speed
Around 22% better clock speed
Common positions AMD Ryzen 9 7950X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
8 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 635.78393 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 610.826915 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -3.9 % |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 555.135698 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 572.277943 samples/min Submissions: 70 | +3.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 577.564381 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 607.399504 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +5.2 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 599.189804 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 605.487015 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +1.1 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 640.195415 samples/min Submissions: 60 | 646.581739 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +1.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 | 560.391684 samples/min Submissions: 256 | +3.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 533.737601 samples/min Submissions: 202 | 553.668977 samples/min Submissions: 108 | +3.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 | 542.577524 samples/min Submissions: 84 | +4.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 | 556.959569 samples/min Submissions: 66 | +5.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6588 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6236 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 356 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 317 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 16722 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14891 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 902 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 783 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 42705 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 38248 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2353 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2017 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 9189 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 556 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 20335.53635 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME B650-PLUS Duration: 49.175 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 13084.381174 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B860-PLUS WIFI Duration: 76.427 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |