製品シリーズのイメージ。
ベストな選択とは AMD Ryzen 9 7950X または Intel Core Ultra 9 285K? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. で発売されました。 2022-09-27.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 24 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2024.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
クロックの高速化
周辺 22% クロックスピードの向上
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 より多くのコア数
8 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K と AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する AMD Ryzen 9 7950X と Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X と Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 635.78393 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 610.826915 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -3.9 % |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 555.135698 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 572.277943 samples/min Submissions: 70 | +3.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 577.564381 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 607.399504 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +5.2 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 599.189804 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 605.487015 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +1.1 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 640.195415 samples/min Submissions: 60 | 646.581739 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +1.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 | 560.391684 samples/min Submissions: 256 | +3.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 533.737601 samples/min Submissions: 202 | 553.668977 samples/min Submissions: 108 | +3.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 | 542.577524 samples/min Submissions: 84 | +4.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 | 556.959569 samples/min Submissions: 66 | +5.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6588 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6236 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 356 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 317 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 16722 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14891 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 902 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 783 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 42705 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 38248 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2353 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2017 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 9189 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 556 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 20335.53635 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME B650-PLUS Duration: 49.175 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 13084.381174 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B860-PLUS WIFI Duration: 76.427 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |