제품군 예시 이미지.
최선의 선택은 무엇인가요? AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 또는 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. 에 출시 2022-09-27.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 24 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 에 출시 Q4/2024.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
더 빠른 클럭 속도
주변 22% 더 나은 클럭 속도
공통 위치 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 더 많은 코어 수
8 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.
콘텐츠 인코딩 및 디코딩에 사용되는 코덱이 내장되어 있습니다. 필요한 작업 속도를 크게 높입니다.
지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 그리고 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.
TDP 요구 사항 비교 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 그리고 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 그리고 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 635.78393 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 610.826915 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -3.9 % |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 555.135698 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 572.277943 samples/min Submissions: 70 | +3.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 577.564381 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 607.399504 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +5.2 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 599.189804 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 605.487015 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +1.1 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 640.195415 samples/min Submissions: 60 | 646.581739 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +1.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 | 560.391684 samples/min Submissions: 256 | +3.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 533.737601 samples/min Submissions: 202 | 553.668977 samples/min Submissions: 108 | +3.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 | 542.577524 samples/min Submissions: 84 | +4.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 | 556.959569 samples/min Submissions: 66 | +5.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6588 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6236 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 356 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 317 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 16722 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14891 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 902 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 783 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 42705 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 38248 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2353 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2017 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 9189 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 556 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 20335.53635 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME B650-PLUS Duration: 49.175 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 13084.381174 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B860-PLUS WIFI Duration: 76.427 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |