AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 1
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 2

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X contre Intel Core Ultra 9 285K. Spécifications, performances, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Libéré
2022-09-27
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Libéré
Q4/2024
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Illustration de la gamme.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Quel est le meilleur choix ? AMD Ryzen 9 7950X ou Intel Core Ultra 9 285K? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. Sorti en 2022-09-27.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 24 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Sorti en Q4/2024.

Differences

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Raisons de considérer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Signaler un bogue
  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    11 left arrow place
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 22% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    4.5 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes AMD Ryzen 9 7950X CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    17 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    12 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    14 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    20 place
  • Plus grand nombre de cœurs

    8 more cores

    24 left arrow 16
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    125 W left arrow 170 W

Spécifications

Données techniques
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
CPU famille et groupe

Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.

  • Groupe de CPU
    AMD Ryzen 7000 left arrow -
  • Série
    Ryzen left arrow Intel Core Ultra 200
  • Form Factor
    Desktops / Boxed Processor left arrow -
  • Génération
    5 left arrow -
  • Modèle précédent
    AMD Ryzen 9 5950X left arrow -
  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop
  • Series
    Ryzen 7000 Series left arrow -
Caractéristiques techniques du CPU

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    4.5 GHz left arrow 3.7 GHz
  • Architecture de base
    normal left arrow -
  • Core Configuration
    16x left arrow -
  • Cœurs de CPU
    16 left arrow 24
  • Fils de processeur
    32 left arrow 24
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Oui left arrow -
  • Max. Boost Clock
    5.7 GHz left arrow -
  • Overclocking
    Oui left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    5.5 GHz left arrow 5.7 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (16 Cores)
    5.2 GHz left arrow -
  • E-core Base Clock
    - left arrow 3.2 GHz
  • E-core Max Turbo
    - left arrow 4.6 GHz
  • Efficient Cores
    - left arrow 16
  • P-core Base Clock
    - left arrow 3.7 GHz
  • P-core Max Turbo
    - left arrow 5.5 GHz
  • Performance Cores
    - left arrow 8
IGPU

Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.

  • GPU Frequency
    2200 MHz left arrow -
  • Nom du GPU
    AMD Radeon Graphics left arrow -
  • GPU Turbo
    Pas de turbo left arrow -
  • Graphics Cores
    2 left arrow -
Prise en charge des codecs matériels

Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.

  • AV1
    Non left arrow -
  • H.264 / AVC
    Non left arrow -
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Non left arrow -
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Non left arrow -
  • JPEG
    Non left arrow -
  • VC-1
    Non left arrow -
  • VP8
    Non left arrow -
  • VP9
    Non left arrow -
Spécifications de la mémoire et PCI

Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par Intel Core Ultra 9 285K et AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.

  • ECC
    Oui left arrow -
  • Max. Mémoire
    256 GB left arrow 256 GB
  • Memory Bandwidth
    83.2 GB/s left arrow -
  • Canaux de mémoire
    2 left arrow 2
  • Type de mémoire
    DDR5 left arrow DDR5-6400
  • PCIe
    PCIe 5.0 left arrow -
Cryptage
  • AES-NI
    Oui left arrow -
Consommation d'énergie

Comparez les exigences du TDP AMD Ryzen 9 7950X et Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Default TDP
    170 W left arrow -
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    95 °C left arrow -
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    170 W left arrow -
  • TDP (PL2)
    230 W left arrow 250 W
  • TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)
    - left arrow 125 W
Technologies et extensions

Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par AMD Ryzen 9 7950X et Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.

  • Architecture
    Raphael (Zen 4) left arrow Arrow Lake
  • Codename
    Raphael AM5 left arrow -
  • Jeu d'instructions (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow -
  • Extensions ISA
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    16 MB left arrow 40 MB
  • L3-Cache
    64 MB left arrow 36 MB
  • Date de sortie
    2022-09-27 left arrow Q4/2024
  • Socket
    AM5 left arrow FCLGA1851
  • Processus technologique
    TSMC 5nm FinFET left arrow TSMC N3B
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow -
  • Intel Smart Cache
    - left arrow 36 MB

Benchmarks

Tests de performance CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 9

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settingsAMD Ryzen 9 7950X Intel Core Ultra 9 285KResult difference¹
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 635.78393 samples/min Submissions: 9 610.826915 samples/min Submissions: 16 -3.9 %
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 555.135698 samples/min Submissions: 14 572.277943 samples/min Submissions: 70 +3.1 %
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 577.564381 samples/min Submissions: 26 607.399504 samples/min Submissions: 41 +5.2 %
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 599.189804 samples/min Submissions: 15 605.487015 samples/min Submissions: 24 +1.1 %
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 640.195415 samples/min Submissions: 60 646.581739 samples/min Submissions: 23 +1.0 %
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 560.391684 samples/min Submissions: 256 +3.8 %
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 533.737601 samples/min Submissions: 202 553.668977 samples/min Submissions: 108 +3.7 %
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 542.577524 samples/min Submissions: 84 +4.0 %
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 556.959569 samples/min Submissions: 66 +5.5 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Results with primary test sources

Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.

Model TestResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Cinebench R15 / multi-core 6588 points
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Cinebench R15 / multi-core 6236 points Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
System RAM: 32 GB
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Cinebench R15 / single-core 356 points
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Cinebench R15 / single-core 317 points Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
System RAM: 32 GB
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Cinebench R20 / multi-core 16722 points
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Cinebench R20 / multi-core 14891 points Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
System RAM: 32 GB
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Cinebench R20 / single-core 902 points
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Cinebench R20 / single-core 783 points Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
System RAM: 32 GB
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Cinebench R23 / multi-core 42705 points
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Cinebench R23 / multi-core 38248 points Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
System RAM: 32 GB
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Cinebench R23 / single-core 2353 points
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Cinebench R23 / single-core 2017 points Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
System RAM: 32 GB

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 9189 points System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB
CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB
Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes.
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 556 points System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB
CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB
Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes.
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 20335.53635 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows
System RAM: 32 GB
OS: Windows NT 10.0
Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME B650-PLUS
Duration: 49.175 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 13084.381174 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows
System RAM: 64 GB
OS: Windows NT 10.0
Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B860-PLUS WIFI
Duration: 76.427 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Dernières comparaisons