什么是最好的选择 AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 或 AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE? 哪种显卡速度更快？
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a base frequency of 2.15 GHz. 内存大小 12 GB. 存储器类型 GDDR6. 发布于 2022-05-10.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 内存大小 16 GB. 存储器类型 GDDR6. 发布于 2023-07-27.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
共同立场 AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 在流行的基准测试中的GPU，用于与其他模型进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 更多内存
33更多内存百分比
12 GB
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
显卡的基本技术数据比较 AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 和 AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, 芯片，信息处理单元.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
80
80
-
80
-
5120
-
160
RDNA 3
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
64 MB
576 GB/s
256 bit
-
18 Gbps
16 GB
GDDR6
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
-
2245 MHz
1880 MHz
-
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
-
-
260 W
-
260 W
用于显卡冷却系统的冷却器的类型和尺寸 AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 和 AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE.
-
-
-
-
-
-
连通性和连接.
-
-
-
-
2.1
-
-
2x8-Pin
-
-
2.1
在电脑游戏中被充分使用的技术数据.
-
-
-
-
-
内置对视频和图像压缩标准的支持.
Decode / Encode
-
-
-
-
所比较的设备在尺寸、重量和插槽上的差异
-
-
-
-
-
GPU的接口和发布日期的比较 AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 和 AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.
-
-
-
-
2023-07-27
46 TFLOPS
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / HIP / Windows | 1773.294966 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 3362.628167 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +89.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / HIP / Windows | 1543.348166 samples/min Submissions: 22 | 2904.040829 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +88.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / HIP / Linux | 1537.197129 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 2522.33331 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +64.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / HIP / Windows | 1544.842826 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 2755.073764 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +78.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / HIP / Linux | 1709.784049 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 2850.718761 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +66.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / HIP / Windows | 1651.191972 samples/min Submissions: 43 | 2779.253387 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +68.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / HIP / Linux | 1725.322462 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 2892.788612 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +67.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / HIP / Windows | 1662.164399 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 2811.331019 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +69.1 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / HIP / Linux | 1693.192703 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 2638.239746 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +55.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / HIP / Windows | 1685.260323 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 2795.052261 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +65.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / HIP / Windows | 1606.147107 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 2609.153346 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +62.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
