製品シリーズのイメージ。
ベストな選択とは AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D または Intel Core Ultra 9 285K? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has a base frequency of 4.4 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. で発売されました。 2025-03-12.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 24 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2024.
考慮すべき理由 クロックの高速化
周辺 19% クロックスピードの向上
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
考慮すべき理由 より多くのコア数
12 more cores
ターボクロックの高速化
周辺 4 % higher specified turbo frequency
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K と AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D と Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D と Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 550.350995 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 571.752688 samples/min Submissions: 74 | +3.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 539.359705 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 607.399504 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +12.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 466.652685 samples/min Submissions: 29 | 560.391684 samples/min Submissions: 256 | +20.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 471.815733 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 553.668977 samples/min Submissions: 108 | +17.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6588 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 356 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 16722 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 902 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 42705 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2353 points |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 9189 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 556 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D | 17106.561906 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 24 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16) Duration: 584.571 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 13084.381174 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B860-PLUS WIFI Duration: 76.427 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |