Illustration de la gamme.
Quel est le meilleur choix ? AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ou Intel Core i9-14900K? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX has a base frequency of 2.4 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Sorti en 2025-04-23.
Intel Core i9-14900K has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Sorti en Q4/2023.
Raisons de considérer Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Raisons de considérer Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée
Autour de 33% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
8 more cores
Vitesse d'horloge turbo plus élevée
Autour de 13 % higher specified turbo frequency
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par Intel Core i9-14900K et AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Comparez les exigences du TDP AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX et Intel Core i9-14900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX et Intel Core i9-14900K, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
Shared tests with results for both models: 3
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | Intel Core i9-14900K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 486.779796 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 523.96838 samples/min Submissions: 78 | +7.6 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 467.137226 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 537.152247 samples/min Submissions: 49 | +15.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 444.767794 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 531.350353 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +19.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 10033.109261 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 99.67 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | 18066.52093 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / FA608PP Duration: 55.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |