Abbildung der Produktfamilie.
Was ist die beste Wahl? AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX oder Intel Core i9-14900K? Welcher Prozessor ist schneller?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX has a base frequency of 2.4 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Freigegeben in 2025-04-23.
Intel Core i9-14900K has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Freigegeben in Q4/2023.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 33% höhere taktfrequenz
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
8 more cores
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 13 % higher specified turbo frequency
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
Hintergrundinformationen zu den verglichenen Prozessoren, Serien, Generationen und Marktsegmenten.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Interne Grafik beeinträchtigt nicht die Leistung der CPU, sondern übernimmt die Arbeit der Grafikkarte bei deren Abwesenheit oder auf mobilen Geräten.
Typen, Kanalmenge des RAM, unterstützt von Intel Core i9-14900K und AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX. Je nach Motherboard können höhere oder niedrigere Speicherfrequenzen unterstützt werden.
Vergleichen Sie die TDP-Anforderungen von TDP AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX und Intel Core i9-14900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektur, Schnittstellen, zusätzliche Anweisungen, die von AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX und Intel Core i9-14900K, Technologien für virtuelle Maschinen und Verfahrenstechnik.
Shared tests with results for both models: 3
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | Intel Core i9-14900K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 486.779796 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 523.96838 samples/min Submissions: 78 | +7.6 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 467.137226 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 537.152247 samples/min Submissions: 49 | +15.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 444.767794 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 531.350353 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +19.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 10033.109261 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 99.67 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | 18066.52093 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / FA608PP Duration: 55.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |