Baikal-T1
Elbrus-S
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Baikal-T1 vs Elbrus-S. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2016
Baikal-T1
Baikal-T1
Released
Q4/2010
User rating
star star star star star
Elbrus-S
Elbrus-S

What's the best choice Baikal-T1 or Elbrus-S? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Baikal-T1 has a base frequency of 1.2 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 5 W. Released in Q4/2016.

Elbrus-S has a base frequency of 0.5 GHz. 1 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 20 W. Released in Q4/2010.

Differences

Baikal-T1 Reasons to consider
Baikal-T1
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 140% better clock speed

    1.2 GHz left arrow 0.5 GHz
  • More number of cores

    1 more cores

    2 left arrow 1
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    5 W left arrow 20 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Baikal-T1 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • CoreMark
    5 place
Elbrus-S Reasons to consider
Elbrus-S
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Elbrus-S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Baikal-T1 Baikal-T1
Elbrus-S Elbrus-S
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Baikal-T left arrow Elbrus-2
  • Family
    Baikal left arrow Elbrus
  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    1.2 GHz left arrow 0.5 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 1
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 1
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Elbrus-S and Baikal-T1. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow -
  • Max. Memory
    64 left arrow -
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow -
  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow DDR2-500
  • PCIe lanes
    4 left arrow -
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow -
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Baikal-T1 and Elbrus-S Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    5 W left arrow 20 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Baikal-T1 and Elbrus-S, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Ethernet
    10 Gb left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    1 MB left arrow 2 MB
  • SATA
    3.0 left arrow -
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 90 nm
  • USB
    2.0 left arrow -
  • Release date
    - left arrow Q4/2010
  • Socket
    - left arrow HFCBGA 1600

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Latest comparisons