Abbildung der Produktfamilie.
Abbildung der Produktfamilie.
Was ist die beste Wahl? Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX oder AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX? Welcher Prozessor ist schneller?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX has a base frequency of 2.4 GHz. 20 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Freigegeben in Q1/2025.
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX has a base frequency of 2.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Freigegeben in 2025-04-23.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Größere Anzahl von Kernen
4 more cores
16
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 4% höhere taktfrequenz
2.4 GHz
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 4 % higher specified turbo frequency
5.2 GHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
Hintergrundinformationen zu den verglichenen Prozessoren, Serien, Generationen und Marktsegmenten.
Ryzen
Mobile
Laptops / Desktops
Ryzen 8000 Series
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
16
32
-
-
-
5.4 GHz
-
-
2.5 GHz
Ja
Interne Grafik beeinträchtigt nicht die Leistung der CPU, sondern übernimmt die Arbeit der Grafikkarte bei deren Abwesenheit oder auf mobilen Geräten.
AMD Radeon 610M
-
2200 MHz
2
Typen, Kanalmenge des RAM, unterstützt von AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX und Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX. Je nach Motherboard können höhere oder niedrigere Speicherfrequenzen unterstützt werden.
-
2
DDR5
PCIe 5.0
Vergleichen Sie die TDP-Anforderungen von TDP Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX und AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
-
-
-
55-75 W
55 W
100 °C
Architektur, Schnittstellen, zusätzliche Anweisungen, die von Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX und AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, Technologien für virtuelle Maschinen und Verfahrenstechnik.
64 MB
-
2025-04-23
FL1
Dragon Range
16 MB
TSMC 5nm FinFET
Shared tests with results for both models: 3
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX | AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 380.474848 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 514.644755 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +35.3 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 388.979486 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 537.068313 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +38.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 423.52739 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 505.323591 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +19.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX | 22125.851845 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 45.196 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX | 10096.940728 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 10M / 20 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: LENOVO / LNVNB161216 Duration: 990.399 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
English
Russian
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
