Abbildung der Produktfamilie.
Was ist die beste Wahl? Intel Processor N100 oder Intel Core Ultra 9 285H? Welcher Prozessor ist schneller?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Processor N100 has a base frequency of 1.80 GHz. 4 / 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6 W. Freigegeben in Q1/2023.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has a base frequency of 2.9 GHz. 16 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Freigegeben in Q1/2025.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Processor N100 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 61% höhere taktfrequenz
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
12 more cores
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 59 % higher specified turbo frequency
Intel Processor N100
Hintergrundinformationen zu den verglichenen Prozessoren, Serien, Generationen und Marktsegmenten.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Interne Grafik beeinträchtigt nicht die Leistung der CPU, sondern übernimmt die Arbeit der Grafikkarte bei deren Abwesenheit oder auf mobilen Geräten.
Integrierte Codecs für die Kodierung und Dekodierung von Inhalten. Erhebliche Beschleunigung der erforderlichen Vorgänge.
Typen, Kanalmenge des RAM, unterstützt von Intel Core Ultra 9 285H und Intel Processor N100. Je nach Motherboard können höhere oder niedrigere Speicherfrequenzen unterstützt werden.
Vergleichen Sie die TDP-Anforderungen von TDP Intel Processor N100 und Intel Core Ultra 9 285H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektur, Schnittstellen, zusätzliche Anweisungen, die von Intel Processor N100 und Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Technologien für virtuelle Maschinen und Verfahrenstechnik.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 3937 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 489 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 1142 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 126 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 6410.87284 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 155.985 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 20681 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 2105 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 8068 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 809 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |