产品系列示意图。
什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i7-13650HX 或 Intel Core Ultra 5 245K? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-13650HX has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (4.90 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K has a base frequency of 4.20 GHz. 14 / 14 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2024.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i7-13650HX 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i7-13650HX
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core Ultra 5 245K 和 Intel Core i7-13650HX. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-13650HX 和 Intel Core Ultra 5 245K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-13650HX 和 Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 6
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-13650HX | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 223.594091 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 271.747991 samples/min Submissions: 28 | +21.5 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 236.660801 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 355.020963 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +50.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 207.545806 samples/min Submissions: 79 | 317.945482 samples/min Submissions: 25 | +53.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 244.514989 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 314.143346 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +28.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.969041 samples/min Submissions: 37 | 311.678232 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +46.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 231.369695 samples/min Submissions: 52 | 323.076488 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +39.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 3850 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 322 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 9752 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 820 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 25066 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2132 points |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13650HX | 6617.827103 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / G614JV Duration: 151.107 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |