什么是最好的选择 Elbrus-4S 或 Elbrus-12S? 哪种处理器更快？
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Elbrus-4S has a base frequency of 0.8 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q4/2014.
Elbrus-12S has a base frequency of 2.0 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 95 W. 发布于 Q2/2022.
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
95 W
共同立场 Elbrus-4S 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
No data
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 150% 更好的时钟速度
0.8 GHz
更多的核心数量
8 more cores
4
共同立场 Elbrus-12S 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
No data
Elbrus-4S
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Elbrus-1
Elbrus
Desktop
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
2 GHz
12
12
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Elbrus-12S 和 Elbrus-4S. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
DDR4-3200
是
比较TDP的要求 Elbrus-4S 和 Elbrus-12S Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
95 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Elbrus-4S 和 Elbrus-12S, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
12
Q2/2022
-
16 nm
(64 + 128) / core
24
No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
