AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

报告一个错误

更多的核心数量

8 more cores

16 8
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 2% higher specified turbo frequency

5.1 GHz 5 GHz

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

报告一个错误

更高的时钟速度

左右 20% 更好的时钟速度

3.6 GHz 3 GHz

规格

技术数据

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

系列

Ryzen Ryzen PRO
Form Factor

Laptops / Desktops Laptops / Desktops
分段

Mobile Mobile
Series

Ryzen AI Max 300 Series Ryzen AI Max PRO 300 Series

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

3 GHz 3.6 GHz
CPU核数

16 8
CPU线程

32 16
Max. Boost Clock

5.1 GHz 5 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

GPU Frequency

2900 MHz 2800 MHz
GPU名称

Radeon 8060S Graphics Radeon 8050S Graphics
Graphics Cores

40 32

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 和 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

存储器类型

256-bit LPDDR5x 256-bit LPDDR5x
PCIe

PCIe 4.0 PCIe 4.0

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 和 AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Configurable TDP

45-120 W 45-120 W
Default TDP

55 W 55 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C 100 °C

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 和 AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

Availability window (manufacturer)

Q1 2025 Q1 2025
Codename

Strix Halo Strix Halo
Date evidence scope

Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source. Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source.
L2-Cache

16 MB 8 MB
L2-Cache

64 MB 32 MB
发布日期

Q1/2025 Q1/2025
插座

FP11 FP11
技术过程

TSMC 4nm FinFET TSMC 4nm FinFET

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 447.642125 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 445.528248 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 548.440615 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 283.682631 samples/min

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	7582 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	464 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	1710 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	1860 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	116 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	115 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	1813 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	114 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	44735 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 1280x720 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	35314 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	2027 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	13988 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	796 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	30087 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 1920x1080 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Time Spy Graphics / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	11164 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 2560x1440 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	10286 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	10636 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.