Qual è la scelta migliore Intel Core Ultra 9 285K o AMD Ryzen 9 5900? Quale processore è più veloce?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 24 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Rilasciato in Q4/2024.
AMD Ryzen 9 5900 has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Rilasciato in Q2/2021.
Motivi da considerare Velocità di clock più alta
Intorno a 6% migliore velocità di clock
Più numero di core
12 more cores
Velocità di clock turbo più alta
Intorno a 21% higher specified turbo frequency
Motivi da considerare Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da AMD Ryzen 9 5900 e Intel Core Ultra 9 285K. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP Intel Core Ultra 9 285K e AMD Ryzen 9 5900 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da Intel Core Ultra 9 285K e AMD Ryzen 9 5900, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6588 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 356 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 16722 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 902 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 42705 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2353 points |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 9189 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 556 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 13084.381174 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B860-PLUS WIFI Duration: 76.427 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |