Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC
SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC vs SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2016
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC
Released
Q1/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

What's the best choice ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC or SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC has a maximum frequency of 1.455 GHz+ 7 %. Memory size 2 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q4/2016.

SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT has a maximum frequency of 2.200 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q1/2022.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2969 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    3002 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2925 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2851 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2594 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 34% better clock speed

    2.200 GHz left arrow 1.455 GHz+ 7 %
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    4 GB left arrow 2 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2257 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2669 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2894 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2676 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    2184 place

Specifications

Technical data
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC
SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC and SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
  • GPU Chip
    GP107-300-A1 left arrow Navi 24
  • Execution units
    5 left arrow 16
  • Shader
    640 left arrow 1024
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    40 left arrow 64
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    2 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    1.752 GHz left arrow 2.25 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    112 GB/s left arrow 144 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 64 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC and SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.455 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 2.200 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.569 GHz+ 8 % left arrow 2.825 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 2.685 GHz+ 3 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 130 W+ 21 %
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 110 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC and SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 70 mm left arrow 2 x 90 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 2
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    174 mm left arrow 194 mm
  • Height
    111 mm left arrow 107 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 40 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT and ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 4
  • Release date
    Q4/2016 left arrow Q1/2022
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    ZT-P10500C-10L left arrow 11314-01-20G
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC and SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
2.01
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 OC
5.79
SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
-->

Latest comparisons