Elbrus-16S
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Elbrus-16S vs AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2021
Elbrus-16S
Elbrus-16S
Released
Q4/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

What's the best choice Elbrus-16S or AMD Ryzen 9 5950X? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Elbrus-16S has a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 130 W. Released in Q4/2021.

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 105 W. Released in Q4/2020.

Differences

Elbrus-16S Reasons to consider
Elbrus-16S
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Elbrus-16S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    777 place
  • CoreMark
    3 place
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    16 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 41% better clock speed

    3.40 GHz left arrow 2.0 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.81 times less performance per watt

    105 W left arrow 130 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 9 5950X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    75 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    29 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    52 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    28 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    27 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    15 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    105 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    76 place
  • Monero Hashrate kH/s
    18 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    42 place
  • CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
    17 place
  • CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
    6 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    112 place

Specifications

Technical data
Elbrus-16S Elbrus-16S
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Elbrus left arrow AMD Ryzen
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.0 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    16 left arrow 16
  • CPU Threads
    16 left arrow 32
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and Elbrus-16S. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-3200 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 2
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Elbrus-16S and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    130 W left arrow 105 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S and Elbrus-16S, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • L2-Cache
    16 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    32 MB left arrow 64.00 MB
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Socket
    HFCBGA 4804 left arrow AM4
  • Release date
    Q2/2022 left arrow Q4/2020

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Elbrus-16S and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
2926
Elbrus-16S
16942
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Latest comparisons